Follow

@Gargron
what do you think of the idea, that instead of strict server restrictions/banns it's only a default and the user can change the default for them self?
Could be a optional and be decided on a per server basis, if they want to give the users the freedom to decide for themself or rather don't have certain servers there at all.

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0

@jannis_vll In case of “silence” users can already override it by following specific users*. For the other things, the liability of the server admin makes overrides impractical.

* Admittedly, you could go further with this and let users override such a measure explicitly, then seeing all content from that server and not just people they follow

@Gargron sadly you could be right about the liability.
Thanks for pointing this out. Just thought about the added freedom for the user.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

This is a brand new server run by the main developers of the project as a spin-off of mastodon.social 🐘 It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct!