@jannis_vll I did explain that in my follow up comments. Decentralised consensus mechanisms are very interesting. But using "money" as the prototype vehicle fr these things is wrong IMHO. Decentralised Identity owenership for example, strikes me as far better suited.
@jwildeboer I think it's one of the easiest to implement. Since you can reward people who participate in building with money. You can't however reward them with extra identities. If you look into blockchains with smart contracts, they could provide decentralized identities, but to keep people interested in hosting part of the decentralized chain, it's far easier to build upon a "money" chain IMHO.
@jannis_vll identity ownership is in IMHO a fundamental human right, not a business. So bringing money into the game is not my goal. At all.
A newer server operated by the Mastodon gGmbH non-profit