mastodon.online is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A newer server operated by the Mastodon gGmbH non-profit

Server stats:

11K
active users

#Reviewer2

2 posts2 participants0 posts today
Möph<p>Just received the first request to review a scientific paper.<br>Now I can almost feel like a 'real' scientist.</p><p>Now, the hard question: will I become <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer1" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer1</span></a> or <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a> <br><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/academicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>academicChatter</span></a></p>
Piia Bartos<p>Reviewer #2 said my 80 ns simulations are too short.</p><p>I would also like longer simulations. However, I simulated the whole RNA Polymerase I complex with DNA with about 800k atoms. Which is far larger than usual systems in MD simulations. If I wanted microsecond scale simulations for this system, I would need months of calculation time. Furthermore, the simulations were not the main point of the story, they just supported the experiments...</p><p><a href="https://mastodontti.fi/tags/compchem" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>compchem</span></a> <a href="https://mastodontti.fi/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://mastodontti.fi/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>reviewer2</span></a> <a href="https://mastodontti.fi/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicChatter</span></a></p>
eLife<p>Fed up with having to reconcile comments from Reviewer 1 and <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a>?</p><p>At eLife, editors and reviewers discuss their reviews with each other before reaching a consensus, letting you focus on how to improve. <a href="https://elifesciences.org/about/peer-review?utm_source=mastodon&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=submissions_organic&amp;utm_content=consultative_fedup" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">elifesciences.org/about/peer-r</span><span class="invisible">eview?utm_source=mastodon&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=submissions_organic&amp;utm_content=consultative_fedup</span></a></p>
Dr. Anna Latour<p>Academics giving feedback be like</p><p>"What you did really well - and I think you should discuss this with your PI - is highlight all the ways in which you still need to improve your writing and thinking."</p><p><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/AcademicMastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicMastodon</span></a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicChatter</span></a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Feedback" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Feedback</span></a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/LifeInAcademia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LifeInAcademia</span></a></p>
Möph<p>Bekomme die zweite Antwort der Reviewer nach den ersten Korrekturen wieder.<br><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a> ist glücklich und empfiehlt die Veröffentlichung.<br><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer1" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer1</span></a> ist eigentlich zufrieden. Will nur eine Kleinigkeit:<br>Ich soll bitte die wichtigste Abbildung des Papers rausnehmen.</p><p>Es ist immer noch die wichtigste Abbildung!<br>Aber zum Glück bekomme ich Rückendeckung der Chefin:<br>"Nimms raus, dann haben wirs publiziert."</p><p>Danke.</p>
Michael Dorner<p>Our paper: "Through the rigourous evaluation of our approach, we identified the limitations of X and Y."<br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>reviewer2</span></a>: "Your approach has the limitations X and Y. Reject."</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pearls" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pearls</span></a> of <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/peerreview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>peerreview</span></a></p>
Möph<p>Oh. Heute kam die Antwort vom Journal.<br>Major Revisions.<br>Hab die Details der Reviewer noch nicht gelesen.<br><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicChatter</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a></p>
Kai Arzheimer<p>Favourite German <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>reviewer2</span></a> phrase: 'vielfältig defizitär' = displaying a whole variety of deficiencies. Particularly nasty, b/c vielfältig has positive connotations <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AcademicChattter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicChattter</span></a></p>
Juan R. Loaiza<p>Be honest: how often do you check journal websites for updates on your submission (multiple choice available if it varies)?</p><p><a href="https://hcommons.social/tags/Academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Academia</span></a> <a href="https://hcommons.social/tags/Philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Philosophy</span></a> <a href="https://hcommons.social/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a></p>
SagaTeam<p>🔭🧪 Curious if anyone would like to share thoughts/experience with Qeios and their public peer review approach?</p><p>Is this a legitimate initiative? Or something to be wary of?</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/astrodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>astrodon</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/academicpublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>academicpublishing</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>research</span></a></p>
Furqan Shah<p>Definition of “Savage”:</p><p>“As strongly requested by the reviewers, here we cite some references [[35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]] although they are completely irrelevant to the present work.”</p><p><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.197" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.202</span><span class="invisible">4.10.197</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/AcademicMastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicMastodon</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>academia</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/publishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>publishing</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/academic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>academic</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/sciencefiction" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sciencefiction</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/sciencemastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sciencemastodon</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>research</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/peerreview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>peerreview</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>reviewer2</span></a></p>
Möph<p>Für dieses Qualitätsediting und hilfreiches Review zahlen wir doch gerne 37.95$ um hinter die <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Paywall" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Paywall</span></a> zu kommen:</p><p>"As strongly requested by the reviewers, here we cite some references [[35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]] although they are completely irrelevant to the present work."<br><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.197" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.202</span><span class="invisible">4.10.197</span></a><br><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/BoycottElsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BoycottElsevier</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Elsevier</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a></p>
RyanGourlie<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/sciencememes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sciencememes</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/memes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>memes</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/editing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>editing</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/writing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>writing</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/phdlife" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>phdlife</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/wine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>wine</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/sendhelp" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sendhelp</span></a></p>
Or M. Bialik<p>Dear <a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>reviewer2</span></a>, we appreciate your suggestion, but further analysis could not be conducted. One co-author has moved two positions since the original draft was written and has no idea where their original data is, while a second co-author has moved to another institute and isn't talking with their former boss, who is holding the data hostage.<br><a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/academicchatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>academicchatter</span></a></p>
Alessia Visconti<p>I've backed "Publish or Perish: A Humorous Party Game about Academia" and, trust me, you should too</p><p><a href="https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/maxhuibai/publish-or-perish-1/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">kickstarter.com/projects/maxhu</span><span class="invisible">ibai/publish-or-perish-1/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mas.to/tags/accademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>accademicChatter</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/publishOrPerish" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>publishOrPerish</span></a></p>
todd ellis<p>Love that feeling of having multiple years of painful work discarded as nothing by a reviewer who's feedback is so consistently wrong or just outright idiotic. Unfortunately, all I can do is try to incorporate their handful of decent suggestions (and pettily delete any pre-existing references to their work, of c.).</p><p>ECRs should really support each other to produce the best work, not drown one another in mansplaining. Ugh! <a href="https://eldritch.cafe/tags/PhdLife" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PhdLife</span></a> <a href="https://eldritch.cafe/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a> <a href="https://eldritch.cafe/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a></p>
datenwolf<p>Finally, after over 2 years in internal editing hell, one "out-of-scope-of-the-journal" rejection, a mild case of <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>reviewer2</span></a> and 4 rounds of proof corrections, the paper on our <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/NeuroOCT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NeuroOCT</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/microscope" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>microscope</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/integrated" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>integrated</span></a> optical coherence tomography (<a href="https://chaos.social/tags/oct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>oct</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/opticalcoherencetomography" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>opticalcoherencetomography</span></a>) system and <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/clinical" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>clinical</span></a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/study" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>study</span></a> is published.</p><p><a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.530976" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.1364/BOE.530976</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://chaos.social/tags/scicomm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>scicomm</span></a></p><p>In case you wondered, what I've been up to the past 5 years: That. Among other things.</p>
franco_vazza<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fediscience.org/@satrevik" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>satrevik</span></a></span> <br>Honestly, I think you are just born as <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>reviewer2</span></a> <br>Sometime, I can spot a <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>reviewer2</span></a> even when they pose as a <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/reviewer1" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>reviewer1</span></a> ! <br>It's in the genes...</p>
Bjørn Sætrevik<p>It's been repeated often enough to have become a cliché. But WHY is reviewer #2 more critical of your manuscript than reviewer #1? What could the mechanism be? Comment your own pet theory! </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicChatter</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AcademicPublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AcademicPublishing</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Reviewer2MustBeStopped" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Reviewer2MustBeStopped</span></a></p>
Chris Bohn<p>Reviewer2's gonna <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>reviewer2</span></a></p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://hci.social/@reviewer2" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>reviewer2</span></a></span></p>