Mastodon

MöphJust received the first request to review a scientific paper. Now I can almost feel like a 'real' scientist.Now, the hard question: will I become <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer1" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer1</a> or <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/academicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#academicChatter</a>

Piia BartosReviewer #2 said my 80 ns simulations are too short.I would also like longer simulations. However, I simulated the whole RNA Polymerase I complex with DNA with about 800k atoms. Which is far larger than usual systems in MD simulations. If I wanted microsecond scale simulations for this system, I would need months of calculation time. Furthermore, the simulations were not the main point of the story, they just supported the experiments...<a href="https://mastodontti.fi/tags/compchem" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#compchem</a> <a href="https://mastodontti.fi/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#science</a> <a href="https://mastodontti.fi/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer2</a> <a href="https://mastodontti.fi/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicChatter</a>

eLifeFed up with having to reconcile comments from Reviewer 1 and <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a>?At eLife, editors and reviewers discuss their reviews with each other before reaching a consensus, letting you focus on how to improve. <a href="https://elifesciences.org/about/peer-review?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=submissions_organic&utm_content=consultative_fedup" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://elifesciences.org/about/peer-review?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=submissions_organic&utm_content=consultative_fedup</a>

Dr. Anna LatourAcademics giving feedback be like"What you did really well - and I think you should discuss this with your PI - is highlight all the ways in which you still need to improve your writing and thinking."<a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/AcademicMastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicMastodon</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicChatter</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/Feedback" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Feedback</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/LifeInAcademia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#LifeInAcademia</a>

MöphBekomme die zweite Antwort der Reviewer nach den ersten Korrekturen wieder. <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a> ist glücklich und empfiehlt die Veröffentlichung. <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer1" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer1</a> ist eigentlich zufrieden. Will nur eine Kleinigkeit: Ich soll bitte die wichtigste Abbildung des Papers rausnehmen.Es ist immer noch die wichtigste Abbildung! Aber zum Glück bekomme ich Rückendeckung der Chefin: "Nimms raus, dann haben wirs publiziert."Danke.

Michael DornerOur paper: "Through the rigourous evaluation of our approach, we identified the limitations of X and Y." <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer2</a>: "Your approach has the limitations X and Y. Reject."<a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pearls" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#pearls</a> of <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/peerreview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#peerreview</a>

MöphOh. Heute kam die Antwort vom Journal. Major Revisions. Hab die Details der Reviewer noch nicht gelesen. <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicChatter</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a>

Kai ArzheimerFavourite German <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer2</a> phrase: 'vielfältig defizitär' = displaying a whole variety of deficiencies. Particularly nasty, b/c vielfältig has positive connotations <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AcademicChattter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicChattter</a>

Juan R. LoaizaBe honest: how often do you check journal websites for updates on your submission (multiple choice available if it varies)?<a href="https://hcommons.social/tags/Academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Academia</a> <a href="https://hcommons.social/tags/Philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Philosophy</a> <a href="https://hcommons.social/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a>

SagaTeam🔭🧪 Curious if anyone would like to share thoughts/experience with Qeios and their public peer review approach?Is this a legitimate initiative? Or something to be wary of?<a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/astrodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#astrodon</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/academicpublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#academicpublishing</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#research</a>

Furqan ShahDefinition of “Savage”:“As strongly requested by the reviewers, here we cite some references [[35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]] although they are completely irrelevant to the present work.”<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.197" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.197</a><a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/AcademicMastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicMastodon</a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#academia</a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/publishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#publishing</a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/academic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#academic</a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#science</a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/sciencefiction" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#sciencefiction</a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/sciencemastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#sciencemastodon</a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#research</a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/peerreview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#peerreview</a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer2</a>

MöphFür dieses Qualitätsediting und hilfreiches Review zahlen wir doch gerne 37.95$ um hinter die <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Paywall" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Paywall</a> zu kommen:"As strongly requested by the reviewers, here we cite some references [[35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]] although they are completely irrelevant to the present work." <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.197" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.197</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/BoycottElsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#BoycottElsevier</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Elsevier</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a>

RyanGourlie<a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#science</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/sciencememes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#sciencememes</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/memes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#memes</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/editing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#editing</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/writing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#writing</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/phdlife" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#phdlife</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/wine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#wine</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/sendhelp" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#sendhelp</a>

Or M. BialikDear <a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer2</a>, we appreciate your suggestion, but further analysis could not be conducted. One co-author has moved two positions since the original draft was written and has no idea where their original data is, while a second co-author has moved to another institute and isn't talking with their former boss, who is holding the data hostage. <a href="https://mastodon.world/tags/academicchatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#academicchatter</a>

Alessia ViscontiI've backed "Publish or Perish: A Humorous Party Game about Academia" and, trust me, you should too<a href="https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/maxhuibai/publish-or-perish-1/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/maxhuibai/publish-or-perish-1/</a><a href="https://mas.to/tags/accademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#accademicChatter</a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/publishOrPerish" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#publishOrPerish</a>

todd ellisLove that feeling of having multiple years of painful work discarded as nothing by a reviewer who's feedback is so consistently wrong or just outright idiotic. Unfortunately, all I can do is try to incorporate their handful of decent suggestions (and pettily delete any pre-existing references to their work, of c.).ECRs should really support each other to produce the best work, not drown one another in mansplaining. Ugh! <a href="https://eldritch.cafe/tags/PhdLife" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhdLife</a> <a href="https://eldritch.cafe/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a> <a href="https://eldritch.cafe/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PeerReview</a>

datenwolfFinally, after over 2 years in internal editing hell, one "out-of-scope-of-the-journal" rejection, a mild case of <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer2</a> and 4 rounds of proof corrections, the paper on our <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/NeuroOCT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#NeuroOCT</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/microscope" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#microscope</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/integrated" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#integrated</a> optical coherence tomography (<a href="https://chaos.social/tags/oct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#oct</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/opticalcoherencetomography" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#opticalcoherencetomography</a>) system and <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/clinical" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#clinical</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/study" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#study</a> is published.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.530976" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.530976</a><a href="https://chaos.social/tags/scicomm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#scicomm</a>In case you wondered, what I've been up to the past 5 years: That. Among other things.

franco_vazza<a href="https://fediscience.org/@satrevik" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@satrevik</a> Honestly, I think you are just born as <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer2</a> Sometime, I can spot a <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer2</a> even when they pose as a <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/reviewer1" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer1</a> ! It's in the genes...

Bjørn SætrevikIt's been repeated often enough to have become a cliché. But WHY is reviewer #2 more critical of your manuscript than reviewer #1? What could the mechanism be? Comment your own pet theory! <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AcademicChatter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicChatter</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PeerReview</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/AcademicPublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AcademicPublishing</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Reviewer2MustBeStopped" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Reviewer2MustBeStopped</a>

Chris BohnReviewer2's gonna <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/reviewer2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#reviewer2</a><a href="https://hci.social/@reviewer2" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@reviewer2</a>

Recent searches

Search options

Administered by:

Server stats:

#Reviewer2