***Dave Hill 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇨🇦🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️<p>So if parents can demand opting out if <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/school" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>school</span></a> materials even mention the presence of <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/LGBTQ" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LGBTQ</span></a> people (the real intent being to get schools to drop such <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/books" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>books</span></a>) because that is unconstitutional "coercion," then what happens when (not if) parents object about <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/interracial" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>interracial</span></a> couples in a book? Or race-mingled neighborhoods? Or that there are <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/religions" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>religions</span></a> other than <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Christianity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Christianity</span></a>? Or that a mother has a job outside the home.? Or that kids are playing soccer on the <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Sabbath" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Sabbath</span></a>? </p><p><a href="https://www.lawdork.com/p/scotus-free-exercise-books-schools-lgbtq?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=899862&post_id=161903729" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">lawdork.com/p/scotus-free-exer</span><span class="invisible">cise-books-schools-lgbtq?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=899862&post_id=161903729</span></a></p>