KilleansRow 🇺🇲 🇺🇦🍀<p>1/2 So <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/AviLoeb" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>AviLoeb</span></a>, <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/EricWeinstein" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>EricWeinstein</span></a> and <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/BrianKeating" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>BrianKeating</span></a> walk into a bar. The conversation is interesting, thought provoking and all over the place. How would you focus the next iteration ? The one thread throughout is “What’s wrong with physics and academia such that we’re not seeing rapid progress ?<br /><a href="https://youtu.be/2B_O0fnJyZs?si=mZhPfxQ33lARmB5o" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">youtu.be/2B_O0fnJyZs?si=mZhPfx</span><span class="invisible">Q33lARmB5o</span></a></p><p>Well, we do have observably new <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Physics" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Physics</span></a> if you admit <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/UAP" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>UAP</span></a> observables as a starting point. Someone has in fact solved a few fundamental problems in <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Energy" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Energy</span></a> and <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Gravitation" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Gravitation</span></a>, or…</p>