mastodon.online is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A newer server operated by the Mastodon gGmbH non-profit

Server stats:

11K
active users

#advetising

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Kevin Karhan :verified:<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://meow.social/@Catwoman69y2k" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>Catwoman69y2k</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://dragonchat.org/@dragonfriend" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>dragonfriend</span></a></span> most importantly:</p><p>Only with <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SelfCustody" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SelfCustody</span></a> of all the keys, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SelfHosting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SelfHosting</span></a> of the entire infrastructure <em>and</em> everything being <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/OpenSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenSource</span></a>, one can assure (and [let it be] audit[ed] independently) that the <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/advertised" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>advertised</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/promises" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>promises</span></a> are in fact true.</p><ul><li>All <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/centralized" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>centralized</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SingleVendor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SingleVendor</span></a> and/or <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SingleProvider" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SingleProvider</span></a> solutions - and yes that includes <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.world/@signalapp" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>signalapp</span></a></span> as well (!!!) - are inherently insecure because they can be <em>forced into "cooperation"</em> - may it be with <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Cyberfacism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Cyberfacism</span></a> like <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/CloudAct" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CloudAct</span></a> or <em><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20210908180219/https://twitter.com/thegrugq/status/1085614812581715968" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">listeally a gun to their head</a></em>...</li></ul><p>Cuz not expecting <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.world/@Mer__edith" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>Mer__edith</span></a></span> to break is the same level of <em>"<a href="https://infosec.space/tags/TrustMeBro" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>TrustMeBro</span></a>!"</em> assurances as <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/AN%C3%98M" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ANØM</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/EncroChat" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>EncroChat</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SkyECC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SkyECC</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/WhatsApp" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>WhatsApp</span></a> etc. do <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PW3O2mqTn8" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">in their</a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/advetising" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>advetising</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/lies" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>lies</span></a>! </p><ul><li>Remember: Corporations/Foundations/non-profits/... <em>don't have a right to be silent</em> , only individuals, and even then there are certain juristictions that have <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/KeyEscrow" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>KeyEscrow</span></a> laws (i.e. <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/France" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>France</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Russia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Russia</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/KSA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>KSA</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/China" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>China</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/India" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>India</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/UK" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>UK</span></a> , ...) in the books!</li></ul>
James House-Lantto (He/Him)<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/29/23778879/youtube-videos-disabling-ad-blockers-detection" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theverge.com/2023/6/29/2377887</span><span class="invisible">9/youtube-videos-disabling-ad-blockers-detection</span></a></p><p>YouTube is testing the idea/capability of disabling videos entirely if they detect that you are using an ad-blocker.</p><p>I have a feeling this will not end well, I admit I still use YouTube a bit, but I have been enjoying Peertube and Odysee as of late.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/google" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>google</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/alphabet" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>alphabet</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/youtube" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>youtube</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/advetising" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>advetising</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ads" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ads</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/adblocker" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>adblocker</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/adblockers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>adblockers</span></a></p>
Dominic Tyer<p>After the Lilly insulin spoof, world's biggest pharma companies halt Twitter advetising spending</p><p><a href="https://endpts.com/biggest-drug-companies-halted-twitter-ad-buys-after-lilly-insulin-spoof" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">endpts.com/biggest-drug-compan</span><span class="invisible">ies-halted-twitter-ad-buys-after-lilly-insulin-spoof</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mas.to/tags/pharma" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pharma</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Twitter" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Twitter</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/advetising" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>advetising</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/SocialMedia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SocialMedia</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Lilly" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Lilly</span></a></p>